Sep
1
2010
Spirituality & Science, War & Peace By Jeff Courter | 3 comments

A Ground Zero Mosque – Yes or No?

What’s the strongest word in the English language? “No.” Whoever can say “no” and make it stick has power. Power to delay. Power to deny. Power to prevent.

Two-year-olds learn this quickly, to our astonishment and dismay. So we try to take that power away from them – because, sometimes it can be downright dangerous for a two-year-old to get his or her way. But almost instinctively, little ones understand that the word “no” means they drive the decision. They are the acting agents who are taking a stand. They control their own little lives.

Behind the Power of “No”

“No” is an extremely potent word. And its roots reach deep into our culture. For example, the Bible uses “no” as a device to define a code of conduct that God is said to have outlined for Moses – no murder, no thievery, no adultery, no envy, no lies, no other gods. There are other “no’s” as well, but everybody is familiar with this particular list.

“No” is a powerful word in government as well. “Congress shall make no law with regard to the establishment of religion.” The word “no” sets boundaries for what is and isn’t permitted in a civil society.

Ground Zero Mosque – Go? Or No Go?

Image courtesy BBC

Image courtesy BBC

A huge debate now rages in our country over whether New York City should say “No” to a Muslim organization that intends to build an Islamic community center (including a mosque) two  blocks from “Ground Zero” – the location where the World Trade Center once stood. This legal question has become the epicenter of an intense argument about religious liberty versus the right of people to censor actions that they find to be highly offensive – insensitive, inappropriate and deeply disturbing.

Before we look further, let’s consider the source of the request. As someone who has stood side-by-side with Muslims in Afghanistan, fighting against the tyranny of other Muslims, I hope we’ll all remember that, just as Christianity offers many variations on a central theme, the Muslim faith is also highly diverse.

The Muslim group that wants to build this religious center says it’s adamantly opposed to the violent jihadist battles we currently see waged in the name of Islam. These are Sufi Muslims – a sect that is persecuted by Sunni and Shia Muslims because it doesn’t conform to a strict interpretation of Islam and Shariah law. As this video commentary from CNN’s Fareed Zakaria indicates, Sufi religious practices are diametrically opposed to those of Islamic extremists. Say what you will about the judgment and commentary of the imam at the middle of this debate – Sufis embrace Christians and Jews.

So what’s the danger of letting moderate, peace-loving Muslims build a religious center only a stone’s throw away from Ground Zero?

The Mosque Debate – 5 Points to Consider

1) Common-Sense Compassion

Because Sufis struggle for respect within the global Muslim community, I would expect them to be more understanding about the issues surrounding this particular site. Placing a religious facility at this location is almost equivalent to building a McDonald’s next to Mecca’s central holy place. Consider these facts that Newt Gingrich recently observed in a Washington Post commentary:

“More than 100 mosques already exist in New Your City. Meanwhile, there are no churches or synagogues in all of Saudi Arabia. In fact, no Christian or Jew can even enter Mecca.”

I don’t expect Muslims to offer other faiths the keys to Mecca anytime soon. I respect their right to honor territory they consider to be sacred. And although the Ground Zero area is not a “religious” site in the traditional sense – it has become hallowed ground. Many would say it is, indeed, a sacred symbol to Americans. Therefore, although building an adjacent mosque may be legal, it isn’t in “good faith” – literally or figuratively.

2) More Than a Private Choice

This debate focuses not merely on the location of the proposed Mosque/Islamic center, but also the possible use of public funds for its completion. According to recent articles by Reuters and others, the facility may technically qualify for funding from tax revenues. If financing were purely private, it would be hard to make a case against the legal right for the project to proceed. However, if there’s a chance that public funds would be used, then citizens should weigh-in, and expect our collective voice to be heard.

3) Did Someone Forget St. Nicholas Church?

There’s actually another religious institution that intends to build near Ground Zero. Wait, let me rephrase that. This institution intends to REBUILD near Ground Zero – but the press has largely ignored its story. That’s right – ironically, tiny St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church once stood at the base of the Twin Towers. It was the only church destroyed in the 9/11 attacks. Sadly, the church remains in ruins nine years later. St. Nicholas has asked the Port Authority for public funding to help with reconstruction, but so far, it’s a no-go.

How is it possible for New York City to expedite approval of a new Islamic center so relatively quickly – while a previously existing Greek Orthodox church lies in ruins for almost a decade? First thing’s first. Why don’t we fix the Ground Zero church that al Qaeda destroyed, before adding a new neighborhood mosque – or any other place of worship? That only seems fair.

4) No Guarantees

We can’t control the future. Someday, the Sufis may need to sell this facility. (Many churches change hands these days!) A more radical group of Muslims could step in, and use the mosque’s proximity to Ground Zero in harmful ways. Muslims who believe and advocate the very ideology that killed 3000 New Yorkers could someday worship in the shadow of the World Trade Center. Now that’s an atrocious thought. It’s not a certainty. But why should we even open the door to this possibility?

5) Other Municipalities Choose All the Time

New York City’s governing bodies argue that, based on freedom of religion, the Sufis have a right to build their mosque near Ground Zero. But let’s look closer at the responsibilities that come with this freedom.

Freedom of speech does not allow someone to yell “Fire!” in a crowded theater. Freedom of religion does not allow citizens to blow up abortion clinics because their faith abhors abortion. And freedom of religion does not give any religious group the right to put a mosque, church, synagogue or temple anywhere the religious group wants, if it’s not considered to be in the public’s best interest.

I’ve seen dozens of strip malls lie vacant, while local governments denied requests from church groups to use the space. The reason? Churches don’t pay taxes, so the towns wouldn’t collect any revenue. If a small suburb can prevent a church from (pardon the expression) converting existing property into a house of worship, then New York certainly has the legal right to refuse new construction that could potentially harm the neighborhood. It simply needs to exercise that right.

There’s a related issue – the public cost of security. If the Mosque is built, it’s likely to become a target for vandalism – and its worshippers will be in constant danger of street violence. It’s not a pretty thought – but public safety must be a legitimate concern. For a portion of our population, a mosque in this location will only be a lightning rod – not a symbol of tolerance. It may be sad – but it’s realistic. Why invite costly consequences?

Only One Logical Answer

The five issues I’ve outlined all point to one conclusion. It’s best if we help those backing the Mosque project to consider a more viable option. An option that’s not only within New York City’s rights – but is also the right thing to do.

It’s time to exercise the most powerful word in our language. For everyone’s sake, let’s simply say “no” to a new community center and mosque this close to Ground Zero.

- Jeff

P.S. I invite you to discuss issues like this with me and others on Facebook. Join us at the “Afghan Journal” Forum:  http://Facebook.com/AfghanJournal.

P.P.S. Interested in what I learned about Muslims while deployed as an Army trainer in Afghanistan? Check out my book at Amazon.com:  “Afghan Journal: A Soldier’s Year in Afghanistan.”

Aug
19
2010
Celebrating Life, War & Peace By Jeff Courter | 3 comments

Independence Day – Afghan Style

In some ways, Afghans are more like us than we know.

For example, most Americans probably have no idea when Afghanistan last functioned as a truly independent nation. And yet, on August 19th, Afghans everywhere celebrate their unique cultural identity and national freedom.

Afghan Flag flies over Taliban capitalIronically, in both the U.S. and Afghanistan, Independence Day is tied to victory over Great Britain. It’s a fact. Although Afghans have fought many battles through the centuries (and although Afghanistan was never formally part of the British Empire), one particular defeat of the British in 1919 prompted Afghans to mark their country’s freedom.

“Independence Days” Aren’t Created Equal

But that’s where the similarity with America ends. The U.S. declared independence from Great Britain in 1776 – and then fought a war to earn it. Afghanistan, on the other hand, was forced to fight to preserve its independence.

So what? Does Afghanistan share any other obvious similarities with the U.S.? Not really. Not in the form of government, infrastructure, standard of living, rule of law, or legally protected rights for all of its citizens. Unfortunately, Afghanistan – a civilization older than ours by at least a millennium – is still woefully behind us on all these counts. And after decades of war, the country is still struggling desperately to catch up – despite significant financial, military and humanitarian help from us, and many other nations.

Afghan Freedom – More Questions Than Answers

Why should any of this matter to us Americans, half a world away? Does Afghanistan really have meaning for us? And should we continue to support them at all?

More and more Americans of every political persuasion seem to be asking those questions. Conservatives and liberals, alike, wonder aloud if the human and financial capital we’re investing in Afghanistan is worth it. Will it ever make any lasting difference to Afghans – or to us, here in our own country?

We wonder if the Afghan people really want to see progress, and if they’re able to rise above a deep-rooted tendency to fight amongst themselves and with others. Their history is one of continuous conflict, and they pride themselves on their fiercely independent, warring spirit.

More than almost any other territory on the planet, Afghanistan has been claimed by and has defeated more empires – from Alexander the Great and Muslim Arabs, to Persians and the Soviet Union. Even when Afghans aren’t banding together to defeat powerful external threats, they’re often embroiled in their own dynastic feuds between tribal empires. For them, warfare is almost as necessary and natural as breathing. Many of us from other nations wonder if this can change – or if it’s worth the bother to try.

Of course, warfare always harms innocents – women, children, the poor, the elderly, the sick, those who have no means to resist, and those who cannot move out of harm’s way. Afghanistan is full of such people. In fact, most Afghans probably fit this description. In one year working there, I saw more poverty than I had seen in the previous 50 years of my life.

What’s in it for Us?

There are those who would say, “That’s not our problem.” To me, this attitude is more than just callous and cavalier. It’s also short-sighted. Our planet is shrinking every day, as technology brings us closer and closer together. 9/11 could not have happened without modern technology such as cell phones, the Internet, and sadly, of course, modern jumbo jets.

There are still terrorists in Afghanistan who are sworn to destroy anyone who stands in their way. They can, will, and do attack innocent victims anywhere, at any available opportunity. Fighting them where they live seems to make more sense than waiting for them to attack us again.

But a bigger question remains. Are we obligated to continue helping desperate Afghans who live in the shadow of the Taliban and al Qaeda? Should we make it our business to help innocent civilians, while we are in their country, fighting terrorists?

This reminds me of the classic story of brothers Cain and Abel, in the Bible’s Book of Genesis. Cain asks God, “Am I my brother’s keeper?” What human obligation do we have to help those who are less fortunate than ourselves?

I believe it’s actually in our own best interests to do just that – to help those who need it – wherever they may be. By bringing hope and progress to Afghan people, we make the world a little safer – which ultimately makes it safer for us, and those we love. I doubt that we can ever rid the world of hateful ideologies. But most people seek peace. Therefore, if we work to promote peace and prosperity for whomever desires those things, then we ultimately reduce any attraction to terrorism.

Besides, in making friends, we create more friends throughout the world – we get what we give.

But What About Afghans?

It’s clear that they value the concept of freedom. Despite the conflicts and displacement their citizens have endured for generations, a National Day of Independence continues to live on.

Therefore, I encourage all Americans to consider how we can help the people of Afghanistan come closer to experiencing the level of freedom and security we enjoy here in America. What can we do to help Afghans more fully embrace life, liberty and the pursuit of their own happiness? I’m sure they would enjoy this as much as we do – given half a chance. (Just ask any Afghan emigrant, who is torn between living in an unstable, intolerant homeland, or taking their chances in a more hospitable foreign country.)

Who knows what the future holds? But if each of us does our part today, perhaps one day in the future, our Afghan brothers and sisters may be in a position to return the favor. And there may come at a time when we could benefit from their help.

Regardless – I wish a Happy Independence Day to our Afghan friends around the world. May the blessings of peace and prosperity come to you and your country soon – along with all the other blessings that freedom can bring!

Jeff

P.S. I invite you to discuss issues like this with me and others. Join us at the “Afghan Journal” Facebook Forum:  http://Facebook.com/AfghanJournal.

P.P.S. Interested in what I learned while deployed as trainer to Afghan Border Police? Check out my book at Amazon.com:  “Afghan Journal: A Soldier’s Year in Afghanistan.”

Jul
31
2010
Life & Death, War & Peace By Jeff Courter | Comments turned off

Heroes & History – Truth vs. Myth

Note from Jeff: This is the 2nd of 2 posts related to the documentary “Restrepo.” As a soldier, I was deeply moved by this film – it flavors my perspective on other issues. The film is important enough to warrant this treatment. But to clarify – I’m not affiliated with “Restrepo’s” producers, and I don’t receive promotional consideration. The views expressed are entirely my own.


So, July 2010 is now officially history. With Independence Day and Bastille Day on the calendar, July is the one month we most closely associate with ideals like democracy, patriotism and freedom.

Declaration of Independence SigningAs the saying goes, freedom isn’t free. That’s why we honor those who have sacrificed so that we can enjoy our liberties.

But a friend reminds me of another saying, “Never let the facts distort a good story.” And the cynic in me increasingly wonders how often our collective reality is shaped by the desire to believe in a myth.

Let me explain:

A lot can happen in a month. Perhaps most Americans will remember this July for its record-breaking heat – or unrelenting joblessness. But for those paying attention to our military presence in Afghanistan, it’s notable for:

  • The war’s most deadly month yet among U.S. forces
  • A major transition at the top of the chain of command
  • The unauthorized release of classified defense documents that put Afghan informants at risk

I’m not sure if the terms “good PR” and “war” should ever appear in the same sentence. But clearly, this month, those two terms seem as far removed from each other as possible.

Regardless, I think this leads to a more important question. Why should “good PR” matter, anyway? Must the realities of war be systematically sugar-coated, in order to win public support?

Consider this:

RESTREPO_FILMSTILL_GroupA month ago, I wrote about my reaction to the extraordinary Afghanistan war documentary, “Restrepo.” Since then, countless others in our nation have also had profound reactions, as the film has rolled-out across the country. People from all sides agree that this film does a tremendous service by showing in a raw, unvarnished way, the challenges our soldiers faced in Korengal Valley.

Curiously, “Restrepo” stands in stark contrast to another war story that has proliferated recently. It’s a viral email called “The Price They Paid.” It claims to tell the back story of the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence.

According to the email, “History shows us that they paid the price for their bravery.” It recounts many tremendous personal sacrifices the signers endured after their courageous act. It all sounds very plausible.

There’s only one problem. According to an analysis by Snopes.com (the site famous for busting urban legends), many of these historical “facts” are misleading, undocumented or untrue.

What should we make of this? Well, clearly, those who signed the Declaration of Independence put themselves at grave risk on behalf of fundamental American ideals. So did many other Revolutionary-War-era citizens whose names are not immortalized in that document. But why have these core 56 men become such an important symbol?

John Adams holds a key to the answer. According to author Joseph Ellis, Adams believed that, to help others embrace American independence as a “foregone conclusion,” it was essential to simplify and solidify the concept with “events and heroes that fit neatly a dramatic formula…”

Apparently, Adams would’ve made a Hollywood director proud – because his vision certainly is burned into the American psyche! Was he wrong to be so savvy about the power of persuasion? Was he wrong to “promote” independence in this way? And where should we draw the line in “dramatizing” events of national importance to achieve the greater good?

The moral conflict begins when we realize that everyone’s definition of the greater good is NOT equal. What’s more, after decades of commercialization, our increasingly cynical culture now seems to assume that a margin of error always exists between fact and fiction. Therefore, a more jaded public is becoming less willing to give a true story the benefit of the doubt.

But that’s the refreshing beauty of a film like “Restrepo.” It’s clear that there is no façade. It is what it is – a soldier’s-eye-view of life and death in the Afghan War. No need to embellish this story with grand Hollywood plot lines – or intensify it with spellbinding special effects – or recast it with heroes who have superhuman powers.

And this “keep-it-real” approach is cutting through the filters that often make today’s Americans skeptical.

The men of “Restrepo” rightfully stand on their own merits. In the same way, the men who signed our Declaration of Independence can stand proudly. We should honor the purity and truth of their courage – raw and uncut. No additives or preservatives required. No need to rewrite history.

- Jeff

P.S. Want to learn more about “Restrepo”? Don’t miss these resources:

Restrepo on Facebook – Find a theater and follow all the latest news
Restrepo movie site – Get official information, clips & more
Sebastian Junger’s online forum – Interact with director, Sebastian Junger, and his fans

P.P.S. Interested in my experiences and thoughts on Afghanistan? Check out my book at Amazon.com,  “Afghan Journal: A Soldier’s Year in Afghanistan.” Or join me on Facebook at http://Facebook.com/AfghanJournal.

Jun
30
2010
Life & Death, War & Peace By Jeff Courter | 9 comments

RESTREPO: Real Love, Real Sacrifice, in Real Time

Greater love hath no man than this – that he lay down his life for his friends.

John 15:13

I was fortunate to see a preview of “Restrepo” last weekend in Chicago, on the crest of the documentary’s rolling-thunder nationwide release. It’s an intense window on the Afghan War – expertly developed by two fearless, skilled storytellers – Sebastian Junger (New York Times best-selling author & journalist) and Tim Hetherington (prize-winning Vanity Fair photographer).

Battle CompanyThe film focuses on a single platoon of 15 Soldiers (Battle Company 2/503) during their 15-month tour at a remote observation post in Afghanistan’s notorious Korengal Valley. Junger and Hetherington embedded on three rotations from 2007-2008 – capturing up-close and personal the harsh, relentless realities of combat life on what was arguably one of the most dangerous assignments in the world.

Both the outpost and the documentary are named for PFC Juan Restrepo – a combat medic who was killed shortly after his unit arrived. The story is pure, raw and real, by design. No amped-up sound effects. No commentary from outside the ranks. No soundtrack. This isn’t a dramatization. None is required.

The film aims not to judge the war. Instead, as Junger says, it focuses on “honoring Soldiers doing their job” – by showing us first-hand how they fought the Taliban, by revealing the difficulty of this task, and by letting us consider its toll on those who serve.

I appreciate what this movie accomplishes on behalf of common soldiers. Having been deployed at a remote Forward Operating Base in Afghanistan during much of the same timeframe in which “Restrepo” was filmed, I get it. Of course, my experience was much different – much less perilous, day-to-day. And yet, we share a common, unspoken bond.

In my opinion, that common bond merits closer inspection…

A Question of Commitment
Clearly, “Restrepo” doesn’t offer easy answers. But what does it teach us about a Soldier’s convictions? Why do warriors choose to fight and die for a cause? And why do they willingly return to battle, again and again?

The movie doesn’t ask these questions directly. But it’s impossible to walk away without wondering about a Soldier’s psyche.

Speaking from my own experience, I think it’s about three kinds of commitment:

  • To ideology
  • To other Soldiers
  • To personal purpose

Commitment to Ideology
Some values transcend life itself. As the New Hampshire motto says, “Live free or die!” For me, protecting our nation’s core principles is more important than remaining on the planet another day. Other volunteers in today’s U.S. military are equally committed. We live to defend liberty – even to the death. It’s an American tradition that began in 1776.

Of course, it’s not unusual to frame life and death in terms of causes that reach beyond our shores – and Afghanistan is no exception. Values we cherish –  like free speech, religious tolerance and civil justice – don’t exist among Afghans. The Taliban are diametrically opposed to these basic human rights, and proof is starkly visible wherever the Taliban have exerted their power. Even devout Muslims are at risk.

So, protecting innocent lives and preserving core democratic values are powerful motivators that keep Soldiers in the fray. But it’s not the whole story. What else is at work?

Commitment to Other Soldiers
Fortunately, after the “Restrepo” preview in Chicago , Sebastian Junger joined the audience for a live question-and-answer session. That’s when I learned an interesting fact – all but one of the platoon members still serve in the Army today.

Why would they want to continue?

Junger suggests that it’s rooted in the bonds of brotherhood and interdependence that develop when lives are at stake. I’m sure that’s true. But I think there’s another dimension beyond camaraderie. Some call it survivor guilt. I simply say this – we cannot forget those who’ve died. Therefore, we want to serve in their honor.

Everyone who’s returned from Afghanistan leaves behind a “Restrepo.” We all have unfinished business – it’s unavoidable. Each of us knew someone who was killed – someone who didn’t come home. We may not have known them well – but we’ve all felt the impact of seeing a flag-draped coffin or a memorial to a fallen Soldier.

Here’s the point: It could have happened to any one of us. And therefore, it affects us all.

It changes us in fundamental ways. And it motivates us to act. It compels us to fulfill a mission that the fallen are unable to complete. No Soldier should die in vain. We want their mission to succeed – to demonstrate what those lost lives are worth. And so we continue working together toward a common goal.

Commitment to Personal Purpose
Because Sebastian Junger is foremost a writer, it’s no surprise that his primary channel for the “Restrepo” story is his recently released book, “War.” The beauty of a book format is that it provides the luxury of introspection that video footage can’t touch. And Junger uses this narrative canvas to full advantage.

In carefully examining the psychology, physiology and sociology of combat, “War” concludes that Soldiers are compelled by battle because it provides a clear sense of purpose that’s unmatched in civilian careers. That may be true. But I think the drive starts at a more fundamental level. I think it comes from the universal human desire to find meaning and truth in our existence.

In the rarified air of a war zone, every day holds the possibility of death. Any moment may be a Soldier’s last. Under these conditions, people naturally dig deeper to reconcile their personal convictions and beliefs. They let go of what’s not important. They embrace what matters most. And they strengthen their commitment to advancing core values.

One of those values is the importance of human relationships – what we might call non-romantic “love.” This love is a commitment to the good in others – to putting those interests ahead of our own. It includes a sacrificial element, like the love of a parent for a child. It’s about protecting and nurturing someone dear to us, at any cost.

Soldiers develop this love for one another. And it’s visible in “Restrepo.” In fact, one Soldier observes that it’s even possible for members of a unit to hate combat comrades, yet still defend one another to the death. To those outside a war zone, this is nonsense. But in combat, when Soldiers fight for something larger than themselves, it’s natural and expected. It’s the ultimate form of love in action.

So, what does this mean when one of us is killed? It’s not just another tragic death. It becomes highly personal. It’s the brutal murder of a family member. It’s as if our own child has been lost to an evil force we failed to control.

It leaves each of us with unfinished business.

And it reminds us that there is no rest until we complete the task our lost brothers and sisters will never be able to complete, themselves. That’s why the men of “Restrepo” renamed their outpost to honor their fallen comrade. It reminded them daily of what remained to be accomplished, for the sake of their brother in arms.

Rest in peace, PFC Restrepo.
Those who remain in this world will not forget you. We will finish the job you started.

Jeff

P.S. Want to learn more about Restrepo? Don’t miss these resources:

Restrepo on Facebook – Find a theater and follow all the latest news
Restrepo movie site – Get official information, clips & more
Sebastian Junger’s online forum – Interact with Sebastian and others interested in his books & films

P.P.S. Interested in my thoughts and experiences in Afghanistan? Check out my book at Amazon.com,  “Afghan Journal: A Soldier’s Year in Afghanistan”

May
31
2010
Life & Death, War & Peace By Jeff Courter | Comments turned off

5000 Reasons to Remember Memorial Day

“The Soldier, above all other people, prays for peace – for he must suffer and bear the deepest wounds and scars of war.”

- Douglas MacArthur

Many Americans mark Memorial Day as the first “get away” day of summer – even if it only means spending time in our backyards with a cold beer, some BBQ, family and friends.

But this year, I hope we do more than simply grab our flip-flops and fire up the grill.

5000+ REASONS TO REMEMBER

This year, as summer begins, the War on Terror has reached some sobering milestones. By late last week, American troops killed in action in Iraq had risen to more than 4000. And in Afghanistan, the death toll had climbed beyond 1000.

Military_Cemetery_smIn the months ahead, those numbers are expected to swell, as US troops in Afghanistan surge to more than 98,000 during an all-out effort to secure Taliban strongholds. (For details about shifting troop levels in the War on Terror, read the New York Times story, “Troops in Afghanistan Now Outnumber Those in Iraq” by Elisabeth Bumiller. Or read USA Today’s article, “US Military Death Toll in Afghanistan Reaches 1000.” )

So on this particular Memorial Day, it’s important to remember what this national holiday is really about. Please consider the sacrifices of those – past, present and future – who pay the ultimate price for our freedoms.

As one young, recently-widowed Marine bride observes in her poignant blog:

A Little Pink in a World of Camo:

“Thanksgiving is a day to be thankful for what we have. Memorial day is a day to be thankful for those who died for what we have.”


A MEMORIAL DAY MOMENT – CLOSE TO HOME

Yesterday, for the very first time at the church I attend, our congregation shared a moment of silence for those who gave their lives in service to our country. A Soldier slowly marched to the front of the pews, stepped up to the communion table, and placed a folded flag on a small stand. Then, as Taps played in the background, he saluted the flag. It was a small gesture to honor all those who have served on our behalf. But moreover, it reminds us that our liberties have been won at a tremendous cost.

I’m not the only veteran in my congregation. Two others served in the Korean War, and one in Vietnam. One of the Korean War vets recalls how only 32 of 200 troops in his company returned home alive. The other Korean War vet’s voice still chokes with emotion when he speaks of his service. The Vietnam vet never talks about his experience.

A WARRIOR’S HONOR STARTS WITH DUTY

Unless we’ve been there ourselves, we can never fully appreciate the impact of war on those who serve. However, we can certainly appreciate those who did serve. And we can honor those who gave their lives “to defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” to quote the Oath of Enlistment.

These men and women believed what our government told them – that military action is necessary to defend our values and liberties. And that enemies will attack us and threaten our way of life if we do not fight and defeat them abroad.

Whether troops are drafted or volunteer, our government representatives send them into harm’s way on our behalf – to do battle with those who publicly oppose our way of life. It isn’t pretty. And in fact, it can be horribly lethal. But it is our duty.

BIGGER THAN POLITICS

As citizens, we may disagree about whether military action is wise or necessary. Thankfully, our government grants us the freedom to do so. That government doesn’t belong to someone else. As imperfect as it may be, it is OUR government – “of the people, for the people, by the people” – to quote President Lincoln.

As Americans, it’s our birthright to state our opinions. In fact, it’s not only our right, but our obligation to speak up – because healthy debate and a diverse expression of ideas can ultimately create better laws. Political debate has existed since before we became an independent nation – and it will continue for as long as we are free to disagree. Despite its potential to distract us from core issues, dissent is part of our democratic system – and ironically it’s part of our system’s unique strength.

But Memorial Day isn’t about politics. It’s about something much more fundamental and enduring than any law, any election – or even any political party. It’s about remembering those who believed in preserving democracy – and protecting it to the death – so that we might live in peace.

REMEMBRANCE – WHERE & WHY IT ALL BEGAN

More than any other President, Abraham Lincoln witnessed the violence and horrors of war – and the sacrifices of Americans who fought. More Americans were killed in our own Civil War than any other war in our country’s history. Shortly after the Civil War ended, Memorial Day began. Initially, it was known as Decoration Day – because family, friends and fellow Soldiers decorated the graves of those who died in battle.

It seems appropriate to reflect on Lincoln’s famous words as he honored those killed at Gettysburg:

“The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced.

It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

FROM GETTYSBURG TO KABUL – AN UNBROKEN LINK

We are now in a state of declared war with a global opponent who, under pretext of religion, wants to destroy our system of government. Along the way, they’ll gladly destroy anyone who doesn’t support their radical twist on Islam.

Fortunately, only a very small percentage of the world’s Muslims subscribe to this extreme agenda. However, let’s not forget that it only required a minority of Germans to lead the Nazi movement. We should never underestimate the power of a small-but-violent minority to wreak havoc that rocks the world.

What does this mean for our military personnel who are fighting against oppression from today’s Muslim extremists?

CHOOSING TO FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT

Like those who fought in Germany, Japan, Korea and Vietnam, they are fighting because our government sent them. But unlike those who served in some previous wars, every one of today’s Soldiers volunteered to be there. Every member our armed forces has personally chosen to sacrifice in whatever way necessary on your behalf, and mine.

And therefore – whether you agree with the people or policies that shape our country’s current military actions – I hope we can agree that every member of our military deserves our gratitude and respect.

So, regardless of whether you personally know someone who’s served or died – I hope you’ll pause to remember their sacrifice. I hope you won’t forget what that sacrifice means for your life. And I hope you’ll understand that (as General MacArthur observed), peace is perhaps more important to Soldiers than anyone else.

Jeff

P.S. To read about my thoughts and experiences while I was deployed as a trainer with the Army National Guard on the Pakistan border, check out my book, “Afghan Journal: A Soldier’s Year in Afghanistan.” Read an excerpt and reviews at the “Afghan Journal” site, or buy the book at Amazon.com.

Apr
24
2010
Life & Death, War & Peace By Jeff Courter | Comments turned off

Bono on Governance – Rock the World

If you follow the travels of U2 rock star Bono, you’ve no doubt heard of ONE – the grassroots organization he co-founded. ONE is all about fighting extreme poverty and preventable disease in Africa and other developing nations. I get that.

MORE THAN JUST ONE VOICE
Bono in AfricaFor those of us who’ve served in Afghanistan – who’ve witnessed up close the ravages of abject poverty there – it’s impossible to forget. Some of us channel that experience into advocacy for the Afghan people. At least that’s the case for me. I want to help their country find progress in whatever way I can – even if it’s from a distance. Because ultimately, Afghanistan will never “win” until its people can find a way to sustain themselves.

Therefore, it makes sense that I would admire Bono’s commitment to helping the poor. And when he speaks on this subject, I try to listen.

This week, The New York Times launched a new guest column by Bono called “Africa Reboots.” If his first thoughts are any indicator, I believe the message he’ll be sharing here is just as important as the message he spreads through his music.

He writes…

It’s no secret that lefty campaigners can be cranky about business elites. And the suspicion is mutual. Worldwide. Civil society as a rule sees business as, well, a little uncivil. Business tends to see activists as, well, a little too active. But in Africa, at least from what I’ve just seen, this is starting to change.

The energy of these opposing forces coming together is filling offices, boardrooms and bars. The reason is that both these groups – the private sector and civil society – see poor governance as the biggest obstacle they face. So they are working together on redefining the rules of the African game.

Bono is absolutely right. Governance is key.

GOVERNANCE AS GAME-CHANGER
Political philosopher Thomas Hobbes once wrote that, without government, man’s life would be “nasty, brutal and short.” Unfortunately, even with government, this is too often still the case in much of the world – including Africa and Afghanistan.

What’s needed is good government. Not perfect government (which we can never expect to see in this world) – but a government that serves the people, instead of the other way around.

Winning a war is usually a short-term military objective. But transforming government takes much longer – especially in cultures where religious and cultural traditions shape social structures. To see systemic change in Africa and Afghanistan, we must remain committed for the long haul. If we aren’t, whatever gains we make on the military front are likely to slip away (as we’ve seen with these nations in the past).

For better or worse, this planet connects us all. A strong defense may protect the U.S. from future attack on domestic soil. But the best defense is a good offense. If we can be an active example to other nations in helping them establish good governance – if we can help them weed-out corruption, and find legitimate ways to attract investment in constructive endeavors – then it’s likely we’ll all win in the long run.

As Bono suggests – it’s not about endless aid. It’s about something far more valuable and enduring. It’s about helping others rewrite the rules of their game.

Jeff

P.S. To learn about how our military reached out to forge relationships with Afghan people while I was deployed as a trainer with the Army, check out my book, “Afghan Journal: A Soldier’s Year in Afghanistan.” Read an excerpt and reviews at the “Afghan Journal” site, or buy the book at Amazon.com.

Apr
14
2010
War & Peace By Jeff Courter | Comments turned off

Putting the “Build” in “Clear, Hold & Build”

(NOTE: This is the second of two posts that examine military and humanitarian efforts in Afghanistan – as viewed through the lens of “3 Cups of Tea” author, Greg Mortenson. Read the first post here.)


What’s the secret of success in Afghanistan? It depends on whom you ask. But if you’re Nobel-nominated author Greg Mortenson, it’s all about relationships. More & better relationships.

World Affairs Council Dallas - Military SymposiumThat sounds like a very soft answer to a very hard question. But looks can be deceiving – especially when it’s time to operationalize a “relationship” strategy.

In a recent analysis, the Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS) observed:

The challenge the U.S. faces in its current wars…above all…is to build an effective and integrated civil-military effort that can choose its wars more carefully, carry out armed nation building, and plan and actually execute the necessary programs that support the “shape, clear, hold and build” philosophy that General Stanley McChrystal, and the new leadership of NATO/ISAF, have suggested.

Of course, our military is best equipped to shoulder the responsibility for the “clear” and “hold” aspects of this strategy. We exist to defend and protect. That’s what we do.

But the question remains – how do we successfully “build” in Afghanistan?

That’s where the wisdom of Greg Mortenson can make a huge impact. Our military leaders acknowledge that the armed forces, alone, shouldn’t provide a total solution to this challenge. Nor can we depend solely on the institutionalized diplomacy of the State Department.

In a decentralized tribal culture like Afghanistan, sustainable progress comes through personal interaction. It’s all about forging relationships based on mutual respect with villagers. And that’s where non-governmental organizations (NGOs) can make a tremendous difference.

However, organizations involved in infrastructure development and humanitarian outreach can’t work in isolation. To ensure their safety, efficiency and effectiveness, they must work in close collaboration with military and diplomatic arms of our government.

In short, success depends on the degree of cooperation among everyone on the ground. It’s an “all hands” endeavor. And it’s never too soon to strengthen the ties that connect the many moving parts in this complex equation.

On Saturday 4/17, those shared interests will come together, when several non-governmental organizations reach out to military representatives, to raise awareness about the work they’re doing to help the Afghan people. They’ll also explore ways to coordinate their efforts more closely with our armed forces – now, and when priorities shift full-tilt into “build” mode.

This lunch session follows “Afghanistan: The Next Phase” – a Military Symposium, where Army Chief of Staff, General George Casey will join other military leaders to discuss the road ahead in Afghanistan counterinsurgency efforts. Sponsored by The World Affairs Council of Dallas and The Association of the United States Army North Texas Chapter, the event is free and open to the public, if you reserve a seat by tomorrow (4/15).

The NGO forum is also open to anyone interested in how Americans and Afghans can work together toward a brighter future for that country. Leading the session is Dina Fesler, founder of “War Kids Relief” – an organization devoted to empowering Afghans through cross-cultural communication, support and specialized vocational training.

(For a powerful peek into the work Dina does in getting up-close and personal with Afghans, check out this stirring video…)

For more information before or after Saturday’s event, contact organizer John Stettler. John is a Dallas entrepreneur who embraces Greg Mortenson’s belief that relationships – both here and in Afghanistan – are central to stability in that region.

Here are John’s coordinates:
jmplastinc@aol.com
972-636-9555

John puts his money where his mouth is – with selfless support of both our military and humanitarian resources. He may not be on the front lines, but he’s making a difference with his time, his talent and the tools available to him.

With people like that representing America’s interests, it seems the relationships we build in Afghanistan are destined to have a lasting impact.

Jeff

P.S. To learn about how our military built relationships with Afghan people while I was deployed as a trainer with the Army, check out my book, “Afghan Journal: A Soldier’s Year in Afghanistan.” Read an excerpt and reviews at the “Afghan Journal” site, or buy the book at Amazon.com.

Apr
10
2010
Celebrating Life, War & Peace By Jeff Courter | Comments turned off

Tea with Greg Mortenson – Everyone’s Welcome

(NOTE: This is the first of two posts that examine Afghanistan humanitarian aid and military action – viewed through the lens of “3 Cups of Tea” author, Greg Mortenson. Read the second post here.)

“What Greg understands better than most (and what he practices more than anyone else I know) is the simple truth that all of us are better off when all of us have the opportunity to learn – especially our children. By helping them learn and grow, he’s shaping the very future of a region and giving hope to an entire generation.”

- Admiral Mike Mullen

If you could spend a few hours with your choice of heroes – past or present – whom would you choose?

Last Friday night, I had the unexpected honor of sitting at the table with a man that many people would include on their short list – Nobel Prize nominee Greg Mortenson. Renowned for his book, “3 Cups of Tea,”  Greg has used his passion for peace to quietly build a humanitarian juggernaut. He has established more than 130 schools that have educated almost 60,000 children in some of the most violent, remote areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Greg Mortenson with Afghan school children

Greg Mortenson with Afghan school children

And last weekend, this living legend was in Chicago raising awareness and funds for his Central Asia Institute. On Friday night, he led a roundtable of Islamic cultural experts in a fascinating discussion about how and why to expand educational opportunities in Pakistan. Panelists included:

Ambassador Akbar Ahmed – Chair of Islamic Studies at American University and advisor to the U.S. Naval Academy

Owen Bennett-Jones – BBC World Service Correspondent & author of books on the Af/Pak region

Mir Ibrahim Rahman – Founder & CEO of GEO TV Network, Pakistan’s fastest-growing media company

So why was I there? Call it luck. By chance, I had approached Greg’s organization earlier that week, hoping to meet him at a public promotional event for his latest work, Stones into Schools. And miraculously, I was invited not only to attend this private event – but to join the speakers at the host table!

As you can imagine, I walked away inspired and uplifted. And I’d like to share some of that with you.

LESSONS LEARNED
If you read my blog or my book, you know I’m no authority on Af/Pak affairs. And I’m certainly no dignitary. I’m merely one of many concerned Americans who volunteered to serve our military in that region, hoping to help people reclaim their lives from the Taliban’s choke-hold.

In short – I had nothing of great value to offer this room filled with humanitarians, scholars and educators. Regardless, I was warmly welcomed. This was a “teachable moment” for me. And here are the key takeaway points:

Lesson 1 – Credentials are good, but character counts
Too often in these cynical times, it seems that self-interest rules – but not at Greg’s table. I was surrounded by world-class brainpower. Each person seemed as luminous in the flesh as his credentials are on paper. And yet, I’ve never met more humble, down-to-earth people! Polite, respectful and genuinely interested in dialogue, these brilliant individuals clearly are driven by care and compassion for others.

Lesson 2 – We aren’t alone
I’d guess that about 200 people gathered for this forum. All share a common vision of education as a source of progress – not only for Pakistan, but for the world. At one point, it dawned on me that these participants represent only a tiny fraction of the organizations – from our country as well as from Pakistan – who are deeply committed and actively involved. What an encouraging reality! As Americans, it’s easy to assume we’re the only ones who care so profoundly about achieving constructive change. But actually, we share a common bond with many others, worldwide.

Lesson 3 – Relationships = Power
This is absolutely evident in Greg – who (not surprisingly) was the center of gravity throughout the night. Greg is a remarkably simple and unassuming figure. He reminds me of Mother Theresa – simple words, full of wisdom. No mind-bending thoughts or revolutionary ideas. That’s not to suggest Greg doesn’t have the capacity. It’s just that he seems to have learned that it’s not necessary. To him, relationships are all that matters – and they are the key to his success.

Fortunately, our military is embracing Greg’s “relationship” philosophy – as my fellow citizen-soldier buddy, Charlie Sherpa, recently observed in his “3 Cups/3 Lessons” analysis at “RedBullRising.com.”

Specifically, General David Petraeus, head of the U.S. Central Command, suggests three central “Greg” tenets that soldiers should follow in Afghanistan:

1)  Listen more
2)  Be respectful
3)  Build relationships

Greg has also forged a relationship with the highest-ranking officer in the US Armed Forces -  Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

In fact, during his comments, Greg shared quotes from a spectrum of leaders he admires, from Admiral Mullen to Dr. Albert Schweitzer. What’s the common ground? Despite their diverse perspectives, many of the world’s greatest leaders have succeeded because they understand the importance of developing relationships.

What Does this Mean for the Future of Afghanistan?
Next weekend, there’s an opportunity to explore this topic at another event, sponsored by The World Affairs Council of Dallas and The Association of the United States Army. The public is invited to attend a free Military Symposium, where U.S. Army Chief of Staff General George Casey will discuss the road ahead in Afghanistan, as we turn the corner in the war on terrorism.

Sadly, I will only be able to attend in spirit. But I know that, after the main event, some humanitarian organizations plan to engage military and government leaders in a dialogue about how to work together more constructively toward progress for the Afghan people.

This related forum is being coordinated by a generous Texas entrepreneur, John Stettler – who’s a shining example of Greg’s “relationships rule” concept. In fact, John also donates to Greg’s schools. (By the way, John, if you’re reading this, Greg says, “Hi!” He looks forward to learning more about your endeavors.)

I, too, hope that the lessons of “3 Cups” will prevail at those sessions. Perhaps they could become the foundation for stronger alignment between military, government and private interests, going forward…

Certainly, with examples and encouragement from Greg and his panelists in Chicago, anything is possible!

(To be continued…)

Jeff

P.S. To learn about how our military built relationships with Afghan people while I was deployed as a trainer with the Army, check out my book, “Afghan Journal: A Soldier’s Year in Afghanistan.” Read an excerpt and reviews at the “Afghan Journal” site, or buy the book at Amazon.com.

Apr
6
2010
War & Peace By Jeff Courter | Comments turned off

To Train Military Leaders, Start with the Right Stuff

You can spend your life training a turtle to run – but it will never be anything other than a slow, plodding, defensive animal. If, however, you train a racehorse to run, you dramatically improve the odds of transforming that animal into a winner.

Why am I drawing this analogy? Last week, USA Today published a fascinating article, “U.S. Looking for Leaders in Afghan Army.” The piece illustrates the military’s strategies for selecting and developing leaders from within its ranks.

US Army General McChrystal with Afghan National Army guard of honor (Photo: Getty Images)

US Army General McChrystal with Afghan National Army guard of honor (Photo: Getty Images)

Leadership Obstacles: The 3 C’s
It also underscores the struggles associated with building strong Afghan forces from the top down. In a nutshell – think corruption, cronyism and cultural challenges. These “3 C’s” continually stand in the way of progress. I saw this first-hand, while training border police in Afghanistan with U.S. troops in a remote region near Pakistan.

Actually, buying-and-selling military rank isn’t a concept that’s new or unique to Afghanistan. Even during the American Revolution, many officers bought their commissions. But there’s a huge difference between these two situations. American soldiers were leading a revolution – not drawing a paycheck. Their deep commitment to the cause of independence outweighed their commitment to personal advancement.

Right Stuff – Wrong Place
Many very capable Afghan Soldiers want to do more. They display initiative, talent and desire. However, too often, viable candidates are limited by their position in the pecking order. They aren’t tribal elders or relatives of powerful people. And if American military personnel attempt to develop and promote these rising stars, their more powerful Afghan brethren typically take offense – accusing U.S. forces of meddling.

This scenario is a direct result the cronyism USA Today mentions. If a more capable Afghan is promoted into leadership, but doesn’t kowtow and provide the kickbacks desired, it angers Afghans who are already in power.

Their response isn’t merely about greed or tradition. It’s also about saving face. Power and face-saving are intricately linked. If a powerful Afghan promotes a weak leader – and Americans subsequently remove that “weak link” – the Afghan official who sponsored the promotion looks incompetent, himself. So, unfortunately, it’s in the best interests of those at a higher level to preserve the status quo.

The Fast Path to Leadership
What’s the solution? Find Afghans with strong values, as well as leadership potential. Strong leaders, alone, aren’t sufficient.

As history reveals, leadership without an accompanying sense of justice, fairness and integrity often wreaks havoc. Consider the Taliban. Their ranks are full of dedicated leaders – but their brutal, destructive values threaten the civilized world.

In the USA Today piece, a Harvard-educated military science professor estimates in the article that it takes 10 years to develop good leaders for higher positions. I disagree with that notion. Of course, it would be better if we had the luxury of time. But rarely in a crisis have leaders with that level of mentoring been available.

George Washington, himself, didn’t have a decade of training prior to taking command of the Continental Army. And in most U.S. wars, many officers were promoted to significant leadership positions with little or no training, beyond the experience they previously gained in battle.

A Recruiting Checklist
So – if we want to develop effective Afghan military leaders quickly and efficiently, what qualities should we seek? Obviously, intelligence is key. But so are three other “C’s” – courage, conviction and commitment. We should actively pursue young men who demonstrate that they will sacrifice to protect the interests of others. Leadership requires a clear moral code – as well as the resolve to die for those principles, if necessary.

Not surprisingly, these are same attributes that define good U.S. military leaders.

Yes, there’s a severe leadership problem in Afghanistan – partly due to the culture itself. But if we want to help Afghans move forward, we should help them find and promote the right kind of people, rather than trying to mold leaders from the wrong material.

It starts with selecting horses, not turtles.

Jeff

P.S. To learn about insights from my tour as an Afghan Border Police trainer, check out my book, “Afghan Journal: A Soldier’s Year in Afghanistan.” Read an excerpt and reviews at the “Afghan Journal” site, or buy the book at Amazon.com.

Mar
29
2010
War & Peace By Jeff Courter | Comments turned off

Afghanistan – Beyond the Battlefield

Note: To learn more about the military’s “Next Phase” vision for Afghanistan, check out the event listed at the end of this article – from the World Affairs Council of Dallas/Fort Worth.


If you’ve been tracking recent news, you know that our Commander in Chief made a “touch-and-go” trip to Afghanistan yesterday, to address U.S. troops and allies, as well as native Afghan forces we’re training. In his remarks, the President reinforced his desire to forge a long-term commitment:

“We want to build a lasting partnership, founded upon mutual interests and mutual respect. And I’m looking forward to returning to Afghanistan many times in the years to come.”

President Obama with troops in Afghanistan</br>(Photo: Associated Press)

President Obama with troops in Afghanistan (AP)

Peace – Easier Said Than Done
As a soldier who served in that war-torn nation, I realize just how much change is needed for President Obama to make good on his promise.

In today’s environment, no one feels completely safe visiting Afghanistan. It’s tough even for Afghans to sleep soundly. And the only certain thing is uncertainty.

So – was President Obama merely being gracious to his Afghan hosts? Or should we interpret his words literally?

To me, the most insightful aspect of Sunday’s speech wasn’t about diplomacy and rallying troops as they brace for more battles ahead. Instead, it was when President Obama spoke to something much more fundamental. Take a closer look at his comments…

“Al Qaeda and the violent extremists whom you’re fighting against want to DESTROY. But all of you want to BUILD – and that is something essential about America…You’re bringing hope and opportunity to a people who have known a lot of pain and suffering.”

Hard to imagine anything rising from the ashes of war in such a desolate, impoverished region. And yet, the United States has been integral to that process before – both at home and abroad.

So, assuming that the President meant what he said, let’s imagine for a moment. Exactly what would it take to build an Afghanistan that’s stable and free from the danger of terrorism?

The Road Ahead – What’s Next?
On one hand, the vision of a secure, peaceful Afghanistan may seem too far away for us to invest in such grand thoughts. And yet, if our ultimate goal is to help the Afghan people achieve lasting progress, focusing  solely on immediate military campaigns would be short-sighted.

Anyone who follows this blog or has read my book knows that these issues weigh heavily on my mind. Clearly, we won’t succeed by imposing our will on Afghans. Instead – as in any effective “change management” challenge – the key to progress is in finding common ground with Afghan culture and values. But we can’t expect that process to be fast or easy.

That’s why I’m particularly interested in an upcoming Military Symposium, sponsored by the Dallas/Fort Worth World Affairs Council:

“Afghanistan: The Next Phase”
Featured Speaker: General George Casey, Jr.
Chief of Staff – U.S. Army
Saturday, April 17
8:30 – 11:30 a.m.
Dallas InterContinental Hotel

The session is OPEN to the public. And it’s FREE – if you RSVP by April 15th.

I look forward to hearing what General Casey and others see on the horizon!

In the meantime – tell me – what would you like to hear from our President or our military leaders about how America can best help Afghans move forward?

Jeff

P.S. To learn more about my experiences when I was deployed as an Army trainer in Afghanistan, check out my book, “Afghan Journal: A Soldier’s Year in Afghanistan.” Read an excerpt and reviews at the “Afghan Journal” site, or buy the book at Amazon.com.

← Older Posts