Greater love hath no man than this – that he lay down his life for his friends.
John 15:13
I was fortunate to see a preview of “Restrepo” last weekend in Chicago, on the crest of the documentary’s rolling-thunder nationwide release. It’s an intense window on the Afghan War – expertly developed by two fearless, skilled storytellers – Sebastian Junger (New York Times best-selling author & journalist) and Tim Hetherington (prize-winning Vanity Fair photographer).
The film focuses on a single platoon of 15 Soldiers (Battle Company 2/503) during their 15-month tour at a remote observation post in Afghanistan’s notorious Korengal Valley. Junger and Hetherington embedded on three rotations from 2007-2008 – capturing up-close and personal the harsh, relentless realities of combat life on what was arguably one of the most dangerous assignments in the world.
Both the outpost and the documentary are named for PFC Juan Restrepo – a combat medic who was killed shortly after his unit arrived. The story is pure, raw and real, by design. No amped-up sound effects. No commentary from outside the ranks. No soundtrack. This isn’t a dramatization. None is required.
The film aims not to judge the war. Instead, as Junger says, it focuses on “honoring Soldiers doing their job” – by showing us first-hand how they fought the Taliban, by revealing the difficulty of this task, and by letting us consider its toll on those who serve.
I appreciate what this movie accomplishes on behalf of common soldiers. Having been deployed at a remote Forward Operating Base in Afghanistan during much of the same timeframe in which “Restrepo” was filmed, I get it. Of course, my experience was much different – much less perilous, day-to-day. And yet, we share a common, unspoken bond.
In my opinion, that common bond merits closer inspection…
A Question of Commitment
Clearly, “Restrepo” doesn’t offer easy answers. But what does it teach us about a Soldier’s convictions? Why do warriors choose to fight and die for a cause? And why do they willingly return to battle, again and again?
The movie doesn’t ask these questions directly. But it’s impossible to walk away without wondering about a Soldier’s psyche.
Speaking from my own experience, I think it’s about three kinds of commitment:
- To ideology
- To other Soldiers
- To personal purpose
Commitment to Ideology
Some values transcend life itself. As the New Hampshire motto says, “Live free or die!” For me, protecting our nation’s core principles is more important than remaining on the planet another day. Other volunteers in today’s U.S. military are equally committed. We live to defend liberty – even to the death. It’s an American tradition that began in 1776.
Of course, it’s not unusual to frame life and death in terms of causes that reach beyond our shores – and Afghanistan is no exception. Values we cherish – like free speech, religious tolerance and civil justice – don’t exist among Afghans. The Taliban are diametrically opposed to these basic human rights, and proof is starkly visible wherever the Taliban have exerted their power. Even devout Muslims are at risk.
So, protecting innocent lives and preserving core democratic values are powerful motivators that keep Soldiers in the fray. But it’s not the whole story. What else is at work?
Commitment to Other Soldiers
Fortunately, after the “Restrepo” preview in Chicago , Sebastian Junger joined the audience for a live question-and-answer session. That’s when I learned an interesting fact – all but one of the platoon members still serve in the Army today.
Why would they want to continue?
Junger suggests that it’s rooted in the bonds of brotherhood and interdependence that develop when lives are at stake. I’m sure that’s true. But I think there’s another dimension beyond camaraderie. Some call it survivor guilt. I simply say this – we cannot forget those who’ve died. Therefore, we want to serve in their honor.
Everyone who’s returned from Afghanistan leaves behind a “Restrepo.” We all have unfinished business – it’s unavoidable. Each of us knew someone who was killed – someone who didn’t come home. We may not have known them well – but we’ve all felt the impact of seeing a flag-draped coffin or a memorial to a fallen Soldier.
Here’s the point: It could have happened to any one of us. And therefore, it affects us all.
It changes us in fundamental ways. And it motivates us to act. It compels us to fulfill a mission that the fallen are unable to complete. No Soldier should die in vain. We want their mission to succeed – to demonstrate what those lost lives are worth. And so we continue working together toward a common goal.
Commitment to Personal Purpose
Because Sebastian Junger is foremost a writer, it’s no surprise that his primary channel for the “Restrepo” story is his recently released book, “War.” The beauty of a book format is that it provides the luxury of introspection that video footage can’t touch. And Junger uses this narrative canvas to full advantage.
In carefully examining the psychology, physiology and sociology of combat, “War” concludes that Soldiers are compelled by battle because it provides a clear sense of purpose that’s unmatched in civilian careers. That may be true. But I think the drive starts at a more fundamental level. I think it comes from the universal human desire to find meaning and truth in our existence.
In the rarified air of a war zone, every day holds the possibility of death. Any moment may be a Soldier’s last. Under these conditions, people naturally dig deeper to reconcile their personal convictions and beliefs. They let go of what’s not important. They embrace what matters most. And they strengthen their commitment to advancing core values.
One of those values is the importance of human relationships – what we might call non-romantic “love.” This love is a commitment to the good in others – to putting those interests ahead of our own. It includes a sacrificial element, like the love of a parent for a child. It’s about protecting and nurturing someone dear to us, at any cost.
Soldiers develop this love for one another. And it’s visible in “Restrepo.” In fact, one Soldier observes that it’s even possible for members of a unit to hate combat comrades, yet still defend one another to the death. To those outside a war zone, this is nonsense. But in combat, when Soldiers fight for something larger than themselves, it’s natural and expected. It’s the ultimate form of love in action.
So, what does this mean when one of us is killed? It’s not just another tragic death. It becomes highly personal. It’s the brutal murder of a family member. It’s as if our own child has been lost to an evil force we failed to control.
It leaves each of us with unfinished business.
And it reminds us that there is no rest until we complete the task our lost brothers and sisters will never be able to complete, themselves. That’s why the men of “Restrepo” renamed their outpost to honor their fallen comrade. It reminded them daily of what remained to be accomplished, for the sake of their brother in arms.
Rest in peace, PFC Restrepo.
Those who remain in this world will not forget you. We will finish the job you started.
Jeff
P.S. Want to learn more about Restrepo? Don’t miss these resources:
Restrepo on Facebook – Find a theater and follow all the latest news
Restrepo movie site – Get official information, clips & more
Sebastian Junger’s online forum – Interact with Sebastian and others interested in his books & films
P.P.S. Interested in my thoughts and experiences in Afghanistan? Check out my book at Amazon.com, “Afghan Journal: A Soldier’s Year in Afghanistan”



Excellent review. Very comprehensive and great insight. Lausch is right – this wasn’t a “common” deployment and the men of Battle Company weren’t/aren’t “common” soldiers, however I share your views on the common bond Junger and Hetherington captured. (I haven’t seen the film yet, only read the book…) Even as a POG Marine, having only served tours in Iraq, I feel like Junger nailed it. That “brotherhood” is so strong and nothing in the civilian world compares to it.
Thanks for sharing.
Thanks Christina – I appreciate your interest and the time you took to comment! Actually, I don’t consider this piece a “review” – it’s really only my “reaction” as a soldier. And I’m sorry if my term “common” isn’t used clearly. Actually, I agree wholeheartedly with you and Robert Lausch that this is not a “common” deployment by any means. (Hence my qualifying notes contrasting my own deployment with a tour in the Korengal.) However, these soldiers were not specially selected or trained for this particular mission. Any one of our soldiers could have been assigned there. And perhaps that’s the REAL point. Our troops must rise to whatever mission is put before us – no matter what. The men of the Restrepo platoon rose to the challenge – despite the cost. To me, that indicates not only the quality of our military, but also the character of the men.
Amazing Review. Really captures the essence of Restrepo. Thanks
Thank you for continuing the struggle and the discussion regarding Afghanistan. “On the objective!”
What an excellent article. You have have put into words what I think my son believed wholeheartedly. For these reasons he was committed and proud to go the mile.
RIP PFC Joseph A. Miracle
KIA 7-5-2007 in the Korengal Valley, Afghanistan
Judy – I’m honored and humbled that you took time to comment! Your son and others who sacrificed their lives in Korengal are true heroes. They’ve earned the honor of a grateful nation. If there’s anything I can do to continue Joseph’s mission by remembering his legacy, then I will gladly oblige. It is the very least I can do to pay tribute to him – and to the family he leaves behind. I hope it brings you comfort to know that we will never forget the price he paid.
- Jeff.
Thank you for this excellent commentary. I have read Junger’s book “War” and have requested that our local theatre show the movie “Restrepo”. Everyone needs to understand the fundamental realities of what our military men and women are facing in Afghanistan…I live in New Hampshire…and my son, who was born and raised in New Hampshire with its live free or die spirit, is deployed with his Army Stryker unit in the same area of Afghanistan as the book and movie describe. We pray daily for his safe return and for the safe return of all our military defending freedom around the world.
Hi Gail – I hope your son and his Army unit are making progress on their mission, and are staying safe along the way! (And I hope you’re maintaining, on the home front.) As I revisit comments from my initial reaction to RESTREPO – I want to let you know that the National Geographic TV Channel is airing it this Monday 11/29 at 9 pm. If you haven’t been able to see it yet at the theater, hopefully you’ll be able to see it on TV…
Fantastic review, I cannot wait to see it, but I do have to comment about one other thing, “I appreciate what this movie accomplishes on behalf of common soldiers”, it does and it doesn’t. This was no “common” deployment, and there were not “common” soldiers, few soldiers get to see action as they did, their brothers in the 173rd definitely saw their share, but many units do not.
Hi Robert – I’m revisiting comments from my RESTREPO post, as I look ahead to the film’s premier on Nat Geo channel this Monday (11/29). Thanks for your note! I agree that this was definitely not a “common” deployment – that’s why I was careful to contrast it with my own (which didn’t involve constant firefights). But our troops must rise to whatever mission is put before us – no matter what. The men of the Restrepo platoon rose to the challenge – despite the cost. To me, that indicates not only the quality of our military, but also the character of those men.
Wonderful review and comments, thank you.
Best,
National Geographic Entertainment
National Geographic – Thanks for your support! Moreover, thanks for bringing Restrepo to theaters. Thanks to you, this important story will be shared with a much broader audience.
- Jeff